Analysis of designs and technological parameters of chisel plows and subsoilers
https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2024-03-47
Abstract
Introduction. Improvement of soil tillage processes is the key to quality cultivation of various crops in agriculture and forestry. It is necessary to introduce minimum tillage with minimum energy and labor inputs, providing optimal soil wellness. Deepening of arable layer brings positive results. Creating more favorable conditions for the development of the root system and root nutrition of plants.
Object. The object of research is the design of chisel plows and subsoilers, and their working parts.
Materials and methods. Data was collected in the Yandex search system, as well as in other electronic libraries and information and analytical portals (eLIBRARY, Base, Google Scholar, Springer Link, CyberLeninka). The information was systematized using cluster analysis. Using the computer software package Microsoft Excel and STATISTICA, horizontal dendrograms of similarities and differences in the parameters of the studied aggregates were constructed. The distances between objects were specified as the Chebychev distance metric, and the Unweighted pair-group centroid method was used as a measure of cluster connection. The search for publications was carried out by year from 2014 to 2024.
Results and conclusion. A brief review of loosening working bodies shows that the existing tools have both individual advantages and disadvantages. The analysis of modern working bodies of chisel plows and deep loosening plows has allowed to find ways of further improvement of designs of produced serial implements, which will allow to reduce costs for soil tillage and will be deprived of their disadvantages. The optimum scheme of arrangement of working bodies in the machine – in two rows in staggered order – has been chosen.
About the Authors
S. V. MalyukovRussian Federation
Malyukov Sergey Vladimirovich, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Forestry Mechanization and Machine Design
394087, Voronezh, Timiryazev St., 8
M. V. Shavkov
Russian Federation
Shavkov Mikhail Viktorovich, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Head of the logistics and supply department
394040, Voronezh, Mazlumova St., 25
A. F. Petkov
Russian Federation
Petkov Aleksander Fedorovich, Engineer of the department of forestry mechanization and machine design
394087, Voronezh, Timiryazev St., 8
D. S. Cherenkov
Russian Federation
Cherenkov Dmitriy Sergeevich, VET teacher
394087, Voronezh, Timiryazev St., 8
M. A. Popov
Russian Federation
Popov Maksim Aleksandrovich, Post-graduate student of the Department of Forestry Mechanization and Machine Design
394087, Voronezh, Timiryazev St., 8
A. V. Bolgov
Russian Federation
Bolgov Andrey Vyacheslavovich, Student
394087, Voronezh, Timiryazev St., 8
References
1. AgroBase. https://www.agrobase.ru/catalog/machinery/machinery_6a214443-02e9-43a8-bb2f-c27ca92cf679?ysclid=ltbj5wamsr87904426.
2. Bartenev I. M. Combined tillage machine for protective afforestation. Tractors and agricultural machines. 2018. No 4. Pp. 31-36.
3. Boykov V. M., Startsev S. V., Pavlov A. V., Nesterov E. S., Bashmakov I. A. Development of a soil cultivation scheme with a reasonable arrangement of chisel working bodies. Agricultural scientific journal. 2018. No 12. Pp. 56-58.
4. Gapich D. S., Shvabauer Yu. A., Subbotin S. I., Gubaidulin D. S. Reducing the traction resistance of chisel guns. News of the Nizhnevolzhsky Agro-University Complex: Science and higher professional education. 2023. No 4 (72). Pp. 398-409.
5. Karpov S. N., Kozhukhov A. A., Gerasimov E. V., Khaustov P. A. Soil protection technologies: ways of development. Bulletin of the agrarian and industrial complex of Stavropol region. 2019. No 1 (33). Pp. 8-13.
6. Classification of chisel plows and subsoiler cultivators for tractors. https://vseomtz.ru/spravochniktraktorista/chizelnii-plug?ysclid=ltbo2scwhi94505898
7. Komarov S. A., Savelyev Yu. A., Ishkin P. A. Analysis of mechanization means for deep tillage. Current problems of agricultural science and ways to solve them. Collection of scientific papers. Kinel, 2016. Pp. 338-344.
8. Labukh V. M., Shmidov D. V. Optimization of geometric parameters of the subsoiler. Design, use and reliability of agricultural machinery. 2016. No 1 (15). Pp. 58-65.
9. Maslov G. G., Shishkin M. A. Improving the technology of deep soil loosening. News of Velikoluksk State Agricultural Academy. 2016. No 4. Pp. 44-48.
10. Mashkov S. V., Avdeev D. A. Analysis of the designs of working bodies for deep tillage. Samara AgroVector. 2021. Vol. 1. No 1. Pp. 40-44.
11. Mikhailin A. A., Maksimov V. P. Assessment of the efficiency of processing rainfed slope lands in the southern regions of the Rostov region with the innovative subsoiler GNCh-0.6M. Bulletin of the Bashkir State Agrarian University. 2019. No 4 (52). Pp. 123-129.
12. Mikhailin A. A. Full-scale testing of an innovative subsoiler in the “slope treatment” mode. Bulletin of NGIEI. 2021. No 1. Pp. 5-16.
13. Mikhalchenkov A. M., Feskov S. A., Zhukov A. B., Osadchiy R. V. Analysis of the functional features of deep loosening tools. Design, use and reliability of agricultural machinery. 2019. No 1 (18). Pp. 51-56.
14. Nagaika M. A., Shchukin S. G., Golovatyuk V. A. Study of the working process of a vibratory subsoiler. Bulletin of the Altai State Agrarian University. 2015. No 6 (128). Pp. 110-115.
15. Posmetyev V. I., Malyukova M. A., Nikonov V. O. Calculation of the stability of the ripper at the deepening stage, taking into account the instantaneous center of rotation of the links of its equipment. Scientific bulletin of the Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: High technologies. Ecology. 2015. No 1. Pp. 303-308.
16. Romanyuk N. N., Nukeshev S. O., Toigambaev S. K., Telovov N. K. An original subsoiler for improving the properties of the fertile soil layer. Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural Academy. 2014. No 2. Pp. 76-78.
17. Toygambaev S. K., Omarov T. S., Abenov A. T., Telovov N. K. Purpose and scope of application of the combined subsoiler implement. Agri-food economics. 2023. No 4. Pp. 23-29.
18. Shchirov V. N., Parkhomenko G. G. Assessment of the energy and agrotechnological indicators of the subsoiler using a generalized efficiency indicator. Bulletin of agrarian science of the Don. 2014. No 1 (25). Pp. 4-10.
19. Shchirov V. V., Khizhnyak V. I., Nesmiyan A. Yu., Khlystov E. I., Bobryashov A. P. Improvement of the chisel plow design. Tractors and agricultural machines. 2016. No 4. Pp. 7-10.
20. Balabanov V., Lee A., Norov B., Khudaev I., Egorov V. Investigation of various options for processing gray forest soil in a field crop rotation. E3S Web of Conferences. Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering “CONMECHYDRO 2021”. 2021. 04025.
21. Blednykh V. V., Svechnikov P. G., Troyanovskaya I. P., Grishin A. N. Working elements with repetitive cutting angles for subsurface ploughs. Herald of Science of S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University. 2017. No 2 (93). Pp. 134-140.
22. Cortez L. A., Marques júnior J., Peluco R. G., Siqueira D. S., Siansi F. L., Barbosa R. S., Furlani C. E. A., Camargo L. A., Silva L. S., Gomes R. P. Subsoiling of an oxisol at fixed and varying depth in areas under sugarcane. Precision Agriculture. 2020. Vol. 21. No 6. Pp. 1351-1365.
23. Chuyanov D., Shodmonov G., Ergashov G., Choriyev I. Combination machine for soil preparation and sowing of gourds. E3S Web of Conferences. International Scientific Conference "Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering, CONMECHYDRO 2021". 2021.
24. Dzhabborov N. I., Dobrinov A. V., Eviev V. A. Evaluation of the energy parameters and agrotechnical indicators of aggregate for deep subsurface tillage. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. 012036.
25. Juraev F. U., Artikova M. M., Isayeva L. B., Turaev S. S. Substantiation of technology and equipment for improving the reclamation state of saline soils in irrigated agriculture. The Way of Science. 2019. No 11 (69). Pp. 52-55.
26. Kalinin A. B., Teplinsky I. Z., Ustroev A. A., Kudryavtsev P. P. Selection and substantiation of cultivator adjustment parameters for differential soil treatment on potato based on the rheology state of soil horizons. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. 012025.
27. Kalinin A. B., Novikov M. A., Ruzhev V. A., Teplinsky I. Z. Improving the efficiency of the soil uncompaction by the cultivator-subsoiler through the use of digital systems for working depth control. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. No 723. 032061.
28. Ovchinnikov A. S., Mezhevova A. S., Fomin S. D., Pleskachev Y. N., Borisenko I. B., Vorontsova E. S., Zvolinsky V. P., Tyutyuma N. V., Novikov A. E. Energy and agrotechnical indicators in the testing of machine-tractor units with subsoiler. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2017. Vol. 12. No 24. Pp. 7150-7160.
29. Starovoytov S. I., Akhalaya B. H., Sidorov S. A., Mironova A. V. The trend of tillage equipment development. AMA, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America. 2020. Vol. 51. No 3. Pp. 77-81.
30. Telovov N. K. Achieve high crop yields using a combined instrument for deep loosening. Scientific Discoveries. Proceedings of articles the international scientific conference. 2016. Pp. 27-30.
Review
For citations:
Malyukov S.V., Shavkov M.V., Petkov A.F., Cherenkov D.S., Popov M.A., Bolgov A.V. Analysis of designs and technological parameters of chisel plows and subsoilers. Title in english. 2024;(3 (75)):412-422. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2024-03-47