Preview

Title in english

Advanced search

The influence of a prebiotic feed additive on the physiological, productive parameters and composition of the intestinal microbiome of laying hens of the Hisex Brown cross

https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2024-02-27

Abstract

The relevance is associated with the need to use new diets for growing highly productive modern crossbreed poultry. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of the lactulose-containing additive “Laktuvet” (MK “Stavropolsky”) on economic and biological indicators, the physiological state and the intestinal microbiome of laying hens of the Hisex Brown cross.

Introduction. The relevance is associated with the need to use new diets for growing highly productive modern cross-breed poultry.

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of the lactulosecontaining additive “Laktuvet” (MK “Stavropolsky”) on economic and biological indicators, the physiological state and the intestinal microbiome of laying hens of the Hisex Brown cross.

Materials and methods. At the age of 25 weeks or the 1st phase of laying, using the method of pairs of analogues, 2 groups of laying hens were formed: control and experimental, 70 heads each. Molecular genetic studies of chicken intestinal microbiota were carried out at the research and production company Biotrof LLC, St. Petersburg. At the end of the study, mathematical processing of the results was performed using statistical methods and MS Excel. Object laying hens of the Hisex Brown cross and the prebiotic feed additive “Laktuvet”.

Results with the inclusion of 0.5% of the prebiotic feed additive “Laktuvet”, an increase in the gross yield and intensity of egg laying was established by 1.84 and 1.74%, respectively, and egg weight by 1.17 g (1.86%; P≤0.001). In the intestines of chickens of the experimental group, the number of microorganisms increased by 22.9%, including a 9-fold increase in the number of bacteria of the Phylum Actinobacteria category, and a 1.4-fold increase in microorganisms of the order Ruminococcaceae, which are responsible for the digestion and absorption of fiber; 1.8 times – Lactobacillales bacteria, the most important in the group of lactic acid bacteria, belonging to the class of symbiotics, responsible for the decomposition of plant food and suppressing the growth and development of pathogenic microflora.

Conclusion. The prebiotic feed additive "Laktuvet" in the amount of 0.5% in the diet of laying hens of the Hisex Brown cross has a positive effect on their economic and biological indicators, which confirms the direct relationship between the growth of economic and biological indicators of laying hens and the microbiological composition of the intestinal microbiome.

About the Authors

I. F. Gorlov
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Volga Research Institute for the Production and Processing of Meat and Dairy Products”
Russian Federation

Gorlov Ivan Fedorovich, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Scientific Supervisor,

400066, Volgograd, M. Rokossovsky St., 6



N. V. Kalinina
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Volga Research Institute for the Production and Processing of Meat and Dairy Products”
Russian Federation

Kalinina Natalya Vasilievna, Candidate of Biological Sciences, research laboratory assistant,

400066, Volgograd, M. Rokossovsky St., 6



Z. B. Komarova
Volga Region Research Institute for the Production and Processing of Meat and Dairy Products
Russian Federation

Komarova Zoya Borisovna, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Leading Researcher,

400066, Volgograd, M. Rokossovsky St., 6



M. I. Slozhenkina
«Volga Research Institute for the Production and Processing of Meat and Dairy Products»
Russian Federation

Slozhenkina Marina Ivanovna, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director,

400066, Volgograd, M. Rokossovsky St., 6



E. A. Struk
Volga Research Institute for the Production and Processing of Meat and Dairy Products
Russian Federation

Struk Evgenia Aleksandrovna, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Laboratory Researcher,

400066, Volgograd, M. Rokossovsky St., 6



S. V. Abramov
Volga Region Scientific Research Institute for the Production and Processing of Meat and Dairy Products
Russian Federation

Abramov Sergey Vladislavovich, candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Integrated Analytical Laboratory,

400066, Volgograd, M. Rokossovsky St., 6



References

1. Sabyrzhanov A. U., Mullakaev O. T., Kushaliev K. Zh. The relevance of the use of feed additives in industrial and private poultry farming. Scientific notes of KGAVM N. E. Bauman. 2016. No 2.

2. Shtele A. L. Increasing egg production in highly productive chickens and the problem of its early forecasting. Agricultural Biology. 2014. No 6.

3. Gorlov I.F., Kalinina N.V., Slozhenkina M.I., Komarova Z.B., Rudkovskaya Z.B., Dolzhanov P.B., Berezina O.A. The influence of a new phytoprebiotic feed additive on the economic and biological indicators of broiler chickens. Livestock and feed production. 2023. V. 106. No. 4. P. 178-190.

4. Gorlov I. F., Slozhenkina M. I. The use of lactulose-containing drugs in livestock breeding and in the processing of livestock products: monograph. Volgograd: SFERA LLC, 2020. 152 p.

5. Komarova Z. B., Kalinina N. V., Slozhenkina M. I., Struk E. A. The effectiveness of the influence of prebiotic feed additives on productivity, antioxidant protection and immunological status of chickens. Agricultural and food innovations. 2023. No 1 (21). Pp. 42-52.

6. Zlepkina N. A., Salomatin V. V., Varakin A. T., Zlepkin V. A. Quality of meat of broiler chickens when feeding biologically active drugs. News of the Samara State Agricultural Academy. 2023. No 3. Pp. 83–88.

7. Slozhenkina M. I., Gorlov I. F., Khramtsov A. G., Komarova Z. B., Frolova M. V., Kurmasheva S. S., Rudkovskaya A. V. Growing broiler chickens using new feed additives based on lactulose. Poultry and poultry products. 2021. No 1. Pp. 17-20.

8. Andreev V. A., Stetsyuk O. U., Andreeva I. V. Probiotics: Unresolved Issues. KMAH. 2022. No 4.

9. Varakin A. T., Epifanov V. G., Simonov G. A., Zoteev V. S., Sanin A. A. Organic selenium and yeast probiotic in the diets of lactating sows. News of the Nizhnevolzhsky Agro-University Complex: science and higher professional education. 2021. No 4 (64). Pp. 152-161.

10. Aleksandrova S. S., Loginov S. V., Sadvokasova A. A. Hematological parameters of broiler chickens using probiotics. News of the Nizhnevolzhsky Agro-University Complex: science and higher professional education. 2021. No 1 (69). Pp. 368-373.

11. Kononenko S. I. Increasing the biological potential of poultry through the use of probiotics. Scientific journal of KubSAU. 2017. No 127.

12. Kochish I. I., Myasnikova O. V., Martynov V. V., Smolensky V. I. The influence of probiotic and prebiotic additives on the intestinal microflora of chickens and the expression of genes associated with immunity. Agricultural biology. 2020. No 2. V. 55. Pp. 315-327.

13. Grin M. S. The use of lactulose in the composition of feed KR-1. Current problems of intensive development of animal husbandry. 2019. No 22 (1). Pp. 178-184.

14. Gorlov I. F., Slozhenkina M. I., Mosolov A. A., et al. The influence of the feed additive "Laktuvet-I" on the egg productivity of quails. Bulletin of the Don State Agrarian University. 2022. No 3 (45). Pp. 84-92.

15. Khalimbekov Z., Malakhova L., Griga O., Jafarov N. Effect of feed additives “LaktoMin” and “LaktuVet” on the milk productivity of goats. Agricultural Journal. 2022. V. 15. No 1. Pp. 2687-1246.

16. Fisinin V. I., Laptev G. Yu., Nikonov I. N., Ilyina L. A., Yildirym E. A. Changes in the bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tract of chickens during ontogenesis. Agricultural biology. 2016. № 6. V. 51. Pp. 883-890.

17. Suraj P. F., Kochish I. I., Fisinin V. I., Grozina A. A., Shatskikh E. V. Molecular mechanisms of maintaining poultry intestinal health: the role of microbiota. M.: Agricultural technologies. 2018. Pp. 344.

18. Ryabtseva S. A., Khramtsov A. G., Budkevich R. O., Anisimov G. S., Chuklo A. O., Shpak M. A. Physiological effects, mechanisms of action and use of lactulose. Nutrition issues. 2020. V. 89. No 2. Pp. 5-20.

19. Bagno O., Prokhorov O., Shentseva A. Milk thistle and echinacea when fattening broilers. Poultry farming. 2021. No 5. Pp. 11-14.

20. Khan S., Moore R. J., Stanley D., Chousalkar K. K. The gut microbiota of laying hens and its manipulation with prebiotics and probiotics to enhance gut health and food safety. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2020. No 86 (13). Pp. 600-620.

21. Li J. Current status and prospects for in-feed antibiotics in the different stages of pork production – a review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2017. No 30 (12). Pp. 1667-1673.

22. Chapeau-Chartier M. P., Kulak-Kauskas S. Structure and function of the cell wall in lactic acid bacteria. Microbial Cell Fact 13 (Supplement 1). 2014. No S9.


Review

For citations:


Gorlov I.F., Kalinina N.V., Komarova Z.B., Slozhenkina M.I., Struk E.A., Abramov S.V. The influence of a prebiotic feed additive on the physiological, productive parameters and composition of the intestinal microbiome of laying hens of the Hisex Brown cross. Title in english. 2024;(2 (74)):223-230. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2024-02-27

Views: 34


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9485 (Print)