Agroclimatic conditions of the Kazan-Veshensky sand massif
https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2024-03-16
Abstract
Introduction. The climatic factor has played an important role in human activity throughout history. This issue is especially relevant during the period of active development of territories for economic activity. Key climate indicators require constant monitoring and updating of data.
Object. The object of the study is the agroclimatic conditions of the Kazan-Veshensky sand massif.
Materials and methods. Based on archival data since 1962, the average annual precipitation and average annual air temperature were calculated. At six weather stations using database information from 2012 to 2022 the direction and speed of the wind were established and the impact of climate productivity on agricultural production was assessed using agroclimatic indicators.
Results and conclusions. The average long-term temperature is in the range of 7.56-8.15°C, and the average long-term precipitation is 422.84-518.21 mm. The dominant directions of air masses are the winds of the western and eastern directions. The average frequency of dangerous winds is 10 times a year. The sum of active temperatures was 3383-3427°C. According to the normalized aridity index (NIA), this territory is slightly arid and, according to the Selyaninov hydrothermal coefficient (HTC), belongs to the zone of typical steppes. Thus, the territory of the Kazan-Veshensky sand massif is located in a zone with homogeneous agro-climatic conditions.
Supporting agencies: The work was carried out within the framework of a state assignment Federal Scientific Center for Agroecology RAS No. FNFE-2022-0011 «Development of a new methodology optimal management of bioresources in agricultural landscapes of the arid zone of the Russian Federation using system-dynamic modeling of soil-hydrological processes, a comprehensive assessment of the impact of climate change and anthropogenic loads on agrobiological potential and forest conditions»
About the Authors
D. I. Archakov
Federal Research Center of Agroecology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Archakov Denis Igorevich, junior researcher at the laboratory of hydrology of agroforestry landscapes
400062, Volgograd, Universitetsky Ave., 97
T. Y. Turchin
Federal State Budgetary Institution South European NILOS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Turchin Taras Yaroslavovich, Director of the Branch
346270, Rostov region, Sholokhovsky district, Veshenskaya station
E. S. Kulakova
Novocherkassk Engineering and Reclamation Institute DonGAU
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kulakova Ekaterina Sergeevna, Head of the Department of Environmental Technologies of Nature Management, Faculty of Forestry
346400, Novocherkassk, Pushkinskaya str., 111
References
1. Pugacheva A. M. Climatic fluctuations of dry steppes and their role in the process of demutation. Arid ecosystems. 2020. No 3 (84). Pp. 14-22.
2. Bekmurzaeva L. R., Zaurbekov Sh. Sh., Bratkov V. V. Variability of agroclimatic conditions of the Chechen Republic in a changing climate. News of the Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Natural and exact sciences. 2020. No 3. Pp. 81-87.
3. Zivanovich S. Determing The fire season be analyzing climatic conditions in Northeastern Serbia. Sumarski list. 2023. NN 9-10. Pp. 477-484.
4. Becker R., Boateng E., Gui P., et al. The impacts of conditions on cereal production: implications for food security in Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2023. V. 2. P. 29.
5. Szyga-Pluta K. Assessment of Changing Agroclimatic Conditions in Poland Based on Selected Indicators. Atmosphere. 2022. No 13. Pp. 1-15.
6. Gong L., Liao Y., Han Z., et al. The effects of Global Warming on Agroclimatic Regions in China: Past and Future. Agronomy. 2024. V. 14. Pp. 1-16.
7. Trinka M., Balek J., Semenov D., et al. Future agroclimatic conditions and implications for European grasslands. Biologia plantarum. 2020. V. 64. Pp. 865-880.
8. Buryak Zh. A., Terekhin E. A. Geoinformation modeling of spatiotemporal variability of agroclimatic conditions. Regional geosystems. 2020. V. 3. Pp. 333-342.
9. Gubarev D. I., Levitskaya N. G., Derevyagin S. S. Impact of climate change on soil degradation in arid zones of the Volga region Arid ecosystems. 2022. No 1 (90). Pp. 20-27.
10. Shumova N. A. Quantitative climate indicators as applied to the assessment of hydrothermal conditions in the Republic of Kalmykia. Arid ecosystems. 2021. No 4 (89). Pp. 13-24.
11. Dronova E. A., Yalovenko O. V. Assessment of agroclimatic conditions for the occurrence of dangerous agrometeorological phenomena of the warm period in the Lower Volga region. Astrakhan Bulletin of Environmental Education. 2022. No 2 (68). Pp. 30-36.
12. Zambon L., Ferrara A., Salvia R., et al. Rural Districts between Urbanization and Land Abandonment: Undermining Long-Term Changes in Mediterranean Landscapes. Sustainability. 2018. No 10. Pp. 1159.
Review
For citations:
Archakov D.I., Turchin T.Y., Kulakova E.S. Agroclimatic conditions of the Kazan-Veshensky sand massif. Title in english. 2024;(3 (75)):156-165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2024-03-16
Views:
38
Email this article 