Mineral nutrition in spring barley crops in the south of Russia
https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2023-04-05
Abstract
Introduction. The presented article is devoted to the problem of increasing the yield and quality of spring barley in the zone of chestnut soils. Along with this, the problem of preserving soil fertility was solved by using instead of granular mineral nutrition, processing seed material with biological preparations, as well as their work on the vegetation of barley. It was possible to establish that the applied agricultural approach had a positive effect on the agrochemical indicators of the soil and, as a result, this trend was reflected in the growth of yields.
Object. The object of the survey was two varieties of spring barley recommended for cultivation in the Lower Volga region: Kamyshinsky 23 (control) and Novonikolaevsky.
Materials and methods. In order to increase the yield and quality of spring barley grain, the seed material was processed with Crescin and Biohumus biologics. The above-mentioned preparations were used for vegetation treatment (Crezacin), and were also introduced in an amount of 2.0 tons per hectare (Biohumus) for autumn tillage.
Results and conclusions. The results of the three-year experiment showed that the processing of seed material, the work on vegetation and the introduction of biological preparations for the main treatment had a positive effect on the dynamics of the nutrient content in the chestnut zone. The content of nitrate nitrogen from seed treatment with biological preparations increased by 1.9...2.0 mg/100 g of soil (Crezacin). By the end of the growing season, this difference reached 2.7...3.9 mg/100 g of soil. A similar dependence was maintained on the content of mobile phosphorus, if at the beginning of the tillering phase the difference from the control variant was 8.9 mg/100 g of soil, then by the end of the growing season this difference was 4.9 mg/100 g of soil. That is, in the initial periods of the growing season, barley needed more mobile phosphorus, so necessary for successful rooting, and in the future its consumption was moderate. As a result, the yield of spring barley in the Kamyshinsky 23 variety ranged from 1.79 t/ha (control) to 2.47 t/ha (Vermicompost). And in the Novonikolaevsky variety, these values, respectively, were equal to 1.89 and 2.54 t/ha.
About the Authors
N. Yu. PetrovRussian Federation
Petrov Nikolay Yuryevich, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor of the Department of Technology of Processing and Food Production
Russian Federation, 40002, Volgograd, Universitetskiy Prospekt, 26
V. I. Filin
Russian Federation
Filin Valentin Ivanovich, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor of the Department of Agriculture and Agrochemistry
Russian Federation, 40002, Volgograd, Universitetskiy Prospekt, 26
G. S. Egorova
Russian Federation
Egorova Galina Sergeevna, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Soil Science and General Biology
Russian Federation, 40002, Volgograd, Universitetskiy Prospekt, 26
I. A. Belyaev
Russian Federation
Belyaev Ivan Aleksandrovich, applicant
Russian Federation, 40002, Volgograd, Universitetskiy Prospekt, 26
O. G. Chamurliev
Russian Federation
Chamurliev Omari Georgievich, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Head of the Department of Agriculture and Agrochemistry
Russian Federation, 40002, Volgograd, Universitetskiy Prospekt, 26
References
1. Avdeev A. A., Tikhonov N. I. Current state of barley production. News of the Nizhnevolzhsky Agro-University Complex. 2015. No. 1 (37). Pp. 61-66.
2. Alabushev A. V., Yatsenko V. A., Popov A. S. Yield and grain quality of spring barley varieties in the eastern zone of the Rostov region. Grain Economy of Russia. 2017. No. 3 (51). Pp. 3-5.
3. Burunov A. N., Vasin V. G., Mikhalkin N. G. Indicators of photosynthesis of barley and yield with the integrated use of fertilizers and growth stimulants. Proceedings of the Samara State Academy. 2021. Issue No. 4. Pp. 3-9.
4. Vasin V. G., Burunov A. N., Novikov A. V. Productivity of spring wheat and barley when using fertilizers and growth stimulants. Bulletin of the Ural State Agricultural Academy. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 20-25.
5. Glukhovtsev V. V., Sanina N. V., Apalikov A. A. The use of foliar fertilizers in the technology of cultivating spring barley in the arid conditions of the Middle Volga region. Russian Agricultural Science. 2016. No. 1. Pp. 9-11.
6. Zamyatin S. A., Maksimov V. A., Barieva N. N. The effect of herbicides and biological products on crop weeds and the yield of barley and wheat. Agrarian Science. 2015. No 2. Pp. 15-18.
7. Mitrofanov D. V., Tkacheva T. A. Impact of agrometeorological conditions, mineral fertilizers, precursors and soil moisture on the grain yield of spring barley in the steppe zone of the Southern Urals. News of the Nizhnevolzhsky Agro-University Complex: science and higher professional education. 2021. No 4 (64). Pp. 84-97.
8. Aniskov N. I. et al. Assessment of the adaptive ability of spring barley varieties bred by Siberian Research Institute of Agriculture in the conditions of the Siberian Irtysh region. Bulletin of the Omsk State Agrarian University. 2016. No 4 (24). Pp. 5-9.
9. Pleskachev Yu. N., Voronov S. I., Grabov R. S. Improvement of the main processing system when cultivating spring barley. News of the Nizhnevolzhsky Agro-University Complex: science and higher professional education. 2020. No 1 (57). Pp. 88-95.
10. Surin N. A. et al. Field assessment of promising breeding material for barley and oats in the Yenisei Siberia. Achievements of science and technology of the agro-industrial complex. 2015. No 2. Pp. 14-16.
11. Voronov S. I., Zvolinsky V. P., Pleskachev Yu. N., Grabov R. S. The role of basic tillage techniques in the cultivation of spring barley. Agriculture. 2020. No 2. Pp. 24-26.
12. Sapega V. A., Tursumbekova G. Sh. Characteristics of the main environmental parameters, yield and adaptive ability of spring barley varieties. Achievements of science and technology of the agro-industrial complex. 2015. No 2. Pp. 17-20.
13. Shevchenko S. N., Bisharev A. A. Results of selection of spring barley at the Samara Research Institute of Agriculture. News of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2015. No 4-3. Pp. 592-595.
14. Hudzenko V. M. et al. Assessment of ecological stability in yield for breeding of spring barley cultivars with increased adaptive potential. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems. 2020. No 3. Pp. 425-430.
15. Dawson I. K., Russell J., Powell W. et al. Barley: a translational model for adaptation to climate change. New Phytol. 2015. Vol. 206. Pp. 913-931.
16. Abtew W. G. et al. Ethiopian barley landraces show higher yield stability and comparable yield to improved varieties in multi-environment field trials. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 2015. No 8. Pp. 275-291.
17. Mudarisov S. G., Gabitov J. F., Lobacnevsky Y. P. et al. Nodelug the tehnological process of tillage. Soilcs tillage research. 2019. V. 190. Рp. 70-77.
18. Tokhetova L. A., Akhmedova G. B., Akzhunis R. A. The use of multivariate factor analysis in the selection of spring barley for adaptability to various environmental conditions. Herald of Science of S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University. 2020. No 4 (107). Pp. 70-80.
Review
For citations:
Petrov N.Yu., Filin V.I., Egorova G.S., Belyaev I.A., Chamurliev O.G. Mineral nutrition in spring barley crops in the south of Russia. Title in english. 2023;(4 (72)):58-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2023-04-05