Preview

Title in english

Advanced search

Studying the effectiveness of innovative brands of mineral fertilizers in the cultivation of chickpeakes on light chestnut soils in the Volgograd region

https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2024-02-16

Abstract

Introduction. Possessing high drought and heat tolerance, chickpeas provide more stable yields compared to other leguminous crops. Stable high market conditions for its grain make this crop economically attractive for many farms in the Lower Volga region. However, the relatively low yield of chickpeas forces scientists to search for effective methods to increase the productivity of this crop. The emergence of new brands of mineral fertilizers on the market contributes to the study of this urgent problem.

Purpose of research. Evaluation of the effectiveness of pre-sowing application of various forms of complex fertilizers on the yield of chickpeas on light chestnut soils. Object. The object of the study was the chickpea variety Volzhanin.

Materials and methods. In accordance with the stated goal and objectives of the study, a scheme of field experiment for applying mineral fertilizers to chickpeas was developed, including the following options: 1). APAVIVA NP 12:52; 2). APAVIVA NP(S) 20:20(14); 3). APAVIVA NPK(S) 15:15:15(10); 4). APAVIVA NPK(S) 8:19:29(3); 5). APAVIVA NPK(S) 10:20:20(6); 6). APAVIVA NPK(S) 8:24:24(3). Place of the experiment: Volgograd region, Gorny settlement, crop rotation plot in the Innovation Village National Democratic Institution of the Volgograd State Agrarian University. Agrochemical characteristics: the soil of the experimental plot is light chestnut, heavy loamy, humus 1.7%, pH level 7.5. Content of ammonium nitrogen (NH4) – 5.5 mg/kg, nitrate nitrogen (NO3) – 12.5 mg/kg, mobile phosphorus (P2O5) – 40.8 mg/kg, exchangeable potassium (K2O) – 338 mg/kg soil. Conducting a small-plot field experiment (plot size – 20 m2, option - 80 m2). Total experience area: 480 m2. Repetition – 4 times. The previous crop was spring barley, after harvesting which deep moldboard plowing at 0.25-0.27 m with a PN – 4 – 35 plow was used as the main soil treatment.

Results and conclusions. During research on the application of mineral fertilizers, it was found that the height of plants according to the experimental options ranged from 29.7 to 31.7 cm on the options NP(S) 20:20(14), NPK(S) 10:20:20(6 ), NPK(S) 15:15:15(10), plants were taller than on the variants NP 12:52, NPK(S) 8:24:24(3) and NPK(S) 8:19:29( 3) by 1-2 cm, respectively. The number of formed beans in the NPK(S) 8:24:24(3) variant was maximum – 28 pieces. on variants NPK(S) 10:20:20(6), NPK(S) 15:15:15(10) the number of beans decreased to 27 and the smallest number was formed on variants NP(S) 20:20(14), NPK (S) 8:19:29(3), NP 12:52 – 26, 25 and 24 pieces, respectively. The number of grains per plant for all experimental variants did not differ significantly from 29 to 31 pieces. but the grain weight was different, which in turn affected the yield. The maximum yield was recorded in the NPK(S) 8:19:29(3) option – 2.47 t/ha. On the NPK(S) 15:15:15(10) and NP 12:52 options, the yield decreased to 2.32 and 2.24 t/ha. The lowest rates of less than 2 t/ha were observed in the variants NPK(S) 8:24:24(3), NP(S) 20:20(14), NPK(S) 10:20:20(6) – 1.97, 1.93 and 1.87 t/ha, respectively. Pre-sowing application of NP 12:52, NPK(S) 15:15:15(10), NPK(S) 8:19:29(3) at a dose of 150 kg/ha helps to obtain a yield of 2.24 to 2.47 tons /ha with production profitability from 197 to 242%.

About the Authors

A. N. Sidorov
Volgograd State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Sidorov Aleksander Nikolaevich, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Senior Researcher,

400002, Volgograd, Universitetsky Av., 26



O. G. Chamurliev
Volgograd State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Chamurliev Omariy Georgievich, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Senior Researcher, Director of the Research Institute, 

400002, Volgograd, Universitetsky Av., 26



G. O. Chamurliev
Volgograd State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Chamurliev Georgiy Omarievich, Associate Professor, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences,

400002, Volgograd, Universitetsky Av., 26



A. A. Kholod
Volgograd State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Kholod Anatoly Aleksandrovich, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Senior Researcher, 

400002, Volgograd, Universitetsky Av., 26



I. A. Vasina
Volgograd State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Vasina Irina Aleksandrovna, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Assistant, 

400002, Volgograd, Universitetsky Av., 26



References

1. Amangaliev B. M., Zhussupbekov E. K., Baitarakova K. Zh. Influence of the Application of Methods of Basic Soil Cultivation and Fertilizer on the Yield of Chickpeas in the Almaty Region. Bulletin of the Ryazan State Agrotechnological University named after P. A. Kostychev. 2021. V. 13. № 4. Pp. 5-16.

2. Balashov V. V., Balashov A. V., Malakhova A. A., Balashov V. A. Influence of Hydrothermal Conditions on Elements of Yield Structure and Yield of Chickpea Varieties on Chestnut Soils of the Volgograd Region. Proceedings of the Nizhnevolzhsky Agro-University Complex: science and higher professional education. 2018. № 2. Pp. 17-23.

3. Bondarenko A. N. Effect of Growth-Stimulating Preparations on Productivity and Economic Efficiency of Chickpeas in Conditions of Light Chestnut Saline Soils of the Astrakhan Region. Agrarian Russia. 2019. № 1. Pp. 24-26.

4. Bondarenko A. N. Effectiveness of the Influence of Adapted Cultivation Technologies on the Yield of Leguminous Crops in the Astrakhan Region. Agrarian Russia. 2019. № 11. Pp. 24-27.

5. Borodychev V. V., Pimonov K. I., Mikhailichenko E. N. Agrochemical Assessment of the Use of Mineral Fertilizers and Biopreparations in the Cultivation of Chickpeas in the Rostov Region. Fertility. 2018. № 1 (100). Pp. 34-37.

6. Borodychev V. V., Semenenko A. S. On the Issue of Improving the Efficiency of Water Resources Use in the Cultivation of Chickpeas in the Conditions of Natural Moisture. Scientific Life. 2018. № 2. Pp. 36-38.

7. Dolmatov A. P., Kupriyanov D. A. Influence of Fractional and Differentiated Application of Mineral Fertilizers on the Yield and Quality of Chickpea Grain in Biologized Agriculture of the Orenburg Cis-Urals. Animal husbandry and fodder production. 2018. V. 101. № 1. Pp. 197-203.

8. Mikhalkov D. E., Gubanov V. S. Dependence of chickpea yield on methods of basic tillage and growth stimulators. Agrarian Russia. 2023. № 7. Pp. 9-12.

9. Mikhailichenko E. N., Pimonov K. I., Danilov A. N., Gusakova N. N. Influence of Mineral Fertilizers and Biological Preparations on Chickpea Yield on Southern Chernozem. Agrarian Scientific Journal. 2018. № 4. Pp. 16-21.

10. Nasiev B. N. Improvement of the system of cultivation of leguminous crops in Western Kazakhstan. Fodder production. 2017. № 11. Pp. 21-22.

11. Pimonov K. I., Mikhailichenko E. N. Agrochemical Assessment of the Use of Mineral Fertilizers and Biological Preparations in the Cultivation of Chickpeas in the Rostov Region. Fertility. 2018. № 1 (100). Pp. 34-37.

12. Pleskachev Y. N., Kirichkova I. V., Vasina I. A. Influence of Biopreparations and Trace Elements on Chickpea Yield. Agrarian Russia. 2022. № 9. Pp. 7-10.

13. Poletaev I. S., Solodovnikov A. P., Chetverikov F. P., Khadykin A. V., Gubov V. I. Efficiency of Mineral Fertilizers in the Cultivation of Winter Crops, Chickpeas and Sunflower in the Conditions of the Saratov Left Bank. Agrarian Scientific Journal. 2022. № 7. Pp. 37-40.

14. Sychev V. G., Tyutyuma N. V., Bondarenko A. N. Improved agrotechnological methods of chickpea cultivation. Fertility. 2023. № 2 (131). Pp. 34-37.

15. Gururaj Sunkad, Deepa H., Shruthi T. H., Dinesh Singh. Chickpea wilt: status, diagnostics and management. Indian Phytopathology. 2019. Pp. 1-9.

16. Chang Liu, Guo Yahui, Cheng Yu., He Q. An investigation on the production and stability of chickpea bean sprout beverage. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2019. V. 43. P. 14143.


Review

For citations:


Sidorov A.N., Chamurliev O.G., Chamurliev G.O., Kholod A.A., Vasina I.A. Studying the effectiveness of innovative brands of mineral fertilizers in the cultivation of chickpeakes on light chestnut soils in the Volgograd region. Title in english. 2024;(2 (74)):141-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32786/2071-9485-2024-02-16

Views: 29


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-9485 (Print)